Oil prices will gain 30 percent on average in 2012 compared with a
year earlier on possible supply disruption from Iran, the International
Monetary Fund warned.
The IMF in its new annual report of World Economic outlook has said
that “Iran-related geopolitical oil supply risks extend beyond the
reduction in oil production and exports that appears to be in the making
already and is priced in by markets.”
The following is the text of IMF’s report:
The impact on oil prices of a potential or actual disruption in oil
supplies involving the Islamic Republic of Iran––the world’s third
largest exporter of crude oil––would be large if not offset by supply
increases elsewhere.
A halt of Iran’s exports to Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD) economies (if not offset) would likely trigger an
initial oil price increase of about 20 to 30 percent, with other
producers or emergency stock releases likely providing some offset over
time––a part of this is likely priced in already.
Further uncertainty about oil supply disruptions could trigger a much larger price spike.
A negative supply shock raises the real price of oil by slightly more
than 50 percent on average over the first two years. This reduces the
already sluggish growth of real household income and raises production
costs, eroding profitability.
These factors undermine the recovery in private consumption and
investment growth for economies in all regions, except for net oil
exporters. At the global level, output is reduced by about 1¼ percent.
The short-term impact could be significantly larger if the adverse oil
shock damages confidence or spills over to financial markets, effects
that are not included in this scenario.
Oil prices rose sharply during 2010 and early 2011 to about $115 a
barrel, then eased to about $100 a barrel, and now are back up to about
$115 a barrel.
Production recovered in Libya but fell in various other Organization
of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) producers, and non-OPEC output
remained relatively weak. In addition, geopolitical risks––notably those
centered on the Islamic Republic of Iran—have boosted oil prices.
Projections for 2012–13 assume that oil prices recede to about $110 a
barrel in 2013, in line with prices in futures markets, but in the
current environment low stocks and limited spare capacity present
important upside risks.
In the current environment of limited policy room, there is also the
possibility that several adverse shocks could interact to produce a
major slump reminiscent of the 1930s. For instance, intensified concern
about an oil supply shock related to the Islamic Republic of Iran could
cause a spike in oil prices that depresses output in the euro area,
amplifying adverse feedback loops between the household, sovereign, and
banking sectors.
In the meantime, the oil price shock could also trigger a reassessment
of the sustainability of credit booms and potential growth in emerging
Asia, leading to hard landings in these economies.
This could, in turn, prompt a collapse in non-oil commodity prices
that would hurt many emerging and developing economies, especially in
Latin America and Africa. More generally, a concurrent rise in global
risk aversion could lead to a sudden reversal of capital flows to
emerging and developing economies.
As a result of the recent EU oil import embargo, other countries’
tighter sanctions, and Iran’s partial oil export embargo, the potential
Iranian oil supply shock is morphing into an actual shock because lower
Iranian oil production and exports seem inevitable during 2012 and
beyond. The extent and speed of the decline, however, are difficult to
predict: outcomes will depend on economic and strategic considerations
of a small number of players, including major emerging net importers.
The larger the reduction in the Iranian oil supply, the greater the
risk of global oil market tightening. For example, a reduction in oil
exports equal to total exports to OECD economies would amount to about
1½ million barrels a day, equivalent to a shock of about 2.4 times the
standard deviation of regular fluctuations in global production
Iran-related geopolitical oil supply risks extend beyond the reduction
in oil production and exports that appears to be in the making already
and is priced in by markets. Iran’s location at the Strait of Hormuz,
the choke point for shipment of about 40 percent of global oil exports
(25 percent of global production), and its geographic proximity to other
major oil producers means that there is a risk of a large-scale,
possibly unprecedented, oil supply disruption in the event of military
conflict or attempts to close the
strait.
Given the low responsiveness of global oil demand to price changes in
the short term, such oil supply disruption would require a very large
price response to maintain global supply-demand balance.
http://tehrantimes.com